The underhand ape: Why corruption is normal – New Scientist

Empowered individuals were prone to cheating, say Lammers and Galinsky, yet they were also harsher in their condemnation of immoral acts than were people primed to feel powerless. And they were hypocritical, judging such acts to be less blameworthy if carried out by themselves than by others ( Psychological Science, vol 21, p 737).

Poets, priests & politicians. Captains of industry too. Regret the NS article is registration & eventually subscription only, but this was too good to miss.

‘Nudge’ policies are another name for coercion

Results from agent-based modelling, evolutionary theory, network theory and experiments in group decision-making also support Mettler. Take the “diversity trumps ability” theorem of Scott E. Page, from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor: groups of agents with diverse understandings of the world will solve difficult problems better than narrowly focused groups with higher expertise.

Want to create a really strong password? Don???t ask Google

In the leaked 2009 RockYou dataset, 4 people out of 32,603,387 picked ???2bon2btitq??? and 5 picked ???2bon2b.??? The roughly one-in-a-million probability sounds impressive, but it only puts people using these passwords in the 50th and 48th percentiles of security. In other words, Google???s advised password is more common than what half of users choose. There are about 500,000 more common passwords in the RockYou set-enough that ???2bon2btitq??? is unlikely to come up in an online guessing attack but not nearly enough to prevent instant cracking if leaked in hashed form.

Forgive the duplication, please.